The Digital Puppet Show: Who’s Really Pulling TikTok’s Strings?

How TikTok Masks Soft Power Manipulation

There’s a particular type of person, I usually call them “useful idiots,” but today let’s call them the “Clueless Apologist,” who see TikTok as nothing more than a delightful factory of silly dances, harmless pranks, and cats doing amusingly human things. You’ve met them. They argue with the conviction of someone who just learned the term “cultural exchange” in a TED Talk. “It’s just an app!” they exclaim, rolling their eyes at the mere suggestion that Beijing’s hand might be lurking in the background, weaving a digital web with all the subtlety of a 5G surveillance tower.

These Clueless Apologists are often the same crowd who reflexively blame the United States for most global problems while diving so deep into cultural relativism that one wonders how they manage to make any personal decisions or get out of bed in the morning, you know “All things being equal” “Isn’t the CIA just as bad?” -they chrip. They clutch their pearls over concerns about U.S. surveillance but defend TikTok as a harmless byproduct of free speech and free markets, conveniently ignoring the broader context. They claim ByteDance is just a company, as if its leash isn’t firmly held by the Chinese Communist Party.

TikTok: A Trojan Horse for Soft Power

One has to wonder: Why has ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, fought so ferociously to avoid divesting its U.S. operations? Why has the CCP exerted quiet but unmistakable pressure to block sales or splits, employing every legal loophole and public persuasion tactic available? And why, in a stroke of PR genius, did TikTok preemptively shut down before a potential ban, weaponizing its user base to generate public outcry before the axe had even fallen? These aren’t the actions of a company concerned about quarterly earnings; they’re the moves of a regime with far grander ambitions.

The Clueless Apologists—and their cousins, the Eager Opportunists—fail to understand that TikTok isn’t just a social media platform. It’s a weaponized algorithm in the pocket of an authoritarian state that seeks not to invade the U.S. but to systematically undermine its global dominance. And like all effective tools of influence, it’s wrapped in the warm, dopamine-drenched hug of a user interface designed to make you laugh, scroll, and forget.

The Purpose of TikTok in Beijing’s Playbook

To grasp the significance of TikTok, one has to understand China’s broader aspirations. Beijing doesn’t want to enslave America (they’re far too pragmatic for that), they don’t harbor dreams of planting a flag on the White House lawn. Instead, they aim to displace U.S. hegemony—to knock the United States off its pedestal as the unipolar arbiter of global norms in the post-war period—and replace it with a multipolar world where China holds a larger if not the largest slice of the pie.

For the CCP, TikTok is both a tool of soft power and a Trojan horse. The platform collects massive amounts of data on its users—everything from their preferences and habits to their geographic movements and even biometrics. Such data could be used to tailor influence campaigns, sway public opinion, or subtly introduce narratives that weaken the West’s cohesion while amplifying pro-China sentiment. The algorithm itself is a masterful update to the ancient art of soft persuasion. It knows what you like, feeds you more of it, and gradually nudges you toward content that might reinforce Beijing’s interests. It doesn’t need to scream propaganda; it whispers.

The algorithm itself can be manipulated to prioritize content that sows division, ridicules democratic institutions, and erodes trust in the very systems that make the West strong. The beauty of this strategy is its plausible deniability: no need for tanks or missiles when you can achieve societal fracture through viral videos and trending hashtags many of which are posted by Americans themselves.

The Banality of Manipulation

Many believe they’re too smart for this kind of manipulation. But we are all susceptible. The most common example is Repetition through Algorithms. Music streaming platforms like Spotify, YouTube, or TikTok repeatedly expose users to specific songs, often because those tracks have been pushed by record labels with deep pockets. Initially, you might think, "This song is okay, I guess." But after the tenth exposure, you find yourself humming it in the shower. Eventually you like it if your preferences have been tailored to favor that style. The genius of this strategy lies in its ability to make you feel like you chose to like that song, even though the algorithm has been nudging you all along. This is how preferences are shaped: not by overt coercion but by relentless, curated exposure. And make no mistake—this same principle applies to political and cultural influence.

American movies, fashion, and slang dominate global trends, often creating a gravitational pull toward Western tastes. From Hollywood blockbusters to fast food chains, U.S. soft power has historically shaped global culture, reinforcing America’s hegemonic position not by force, but by making Western norms desirable. Indeed, there’s a reason China bans most Western pop culture, and it’s not because the Chinese Communist Party has an aversion to catchy tunes or superhero blockbusters. The real issue lies in the inherent threat Western pop culture poses to the authoritarian grip of the CCP. Western pop culture, steeped in the values of individualism, freedom of expression, and rebellion against authority, is an ideological Trojan horse—and Beijing knows it. It’s why TikTok itself is banned in China and it’s Chinese version Douyin incorporates state propaganda, educational information and promoting civic virtue.

The Fools at the Gate

Despite this glaring threat, many of our leaders, influencers, and tech moguls have approached TikTok with the naivete of a child reaching for a cookie jar labeled “Free.” Politicians, many of which have received contributions from Bytedance and affiliates, bicker over whether banning the app is worth alienating younger voters. Clueless influencers—especially those most susceptible to short-term incentives—cry foul at any regulation that might affect their follower count, revenue stream or brand deals. Some of these individuals may simply be compromised, bought off with lucrative sponsorships or opportunities dangled by entities with ties to Beijing. Others are merely ignorant, failing to understand that what’s at stake isn’t just an app but the integrity of Western civilization’s soft power.

And let’s not forget the irony of certain self-styled populists, ever vigilant against the encroachments of the “globalists,” yet seemingly blind to the fact that TikTok represents a form of globalism most favorable to China—a platform that erodes Western influence while bolstering Beijing’s.

Why This Matters for America—and the World

If China succeeds in diminishing the U.S.’s role as the global hegemon, the consequences will reverberate far beyond TikTok dances. The post-World War II order, built on U.S.-led institutions, has delivered unprecedented prosperity and relative global stability. The free flow of goods, the enforcement of international norms, and the deterrence of conflict have all depended on America’s leadership.

A world where China calls the shots would be fundamentally different. Beijing’s model prioritizes state control over individual freedom, conformity over innovation, and coercion over consent. Global trade routes might no longer guarantee free access, international bodies could increasingly reflect authoritarian norms, and smaller nations might find themselves ensnared in debt traps rather than benefitting from fair partnerships.

For the average American, this could mean a lower standard of living, as supply chains are redirected to favor Chinese interests and technological innovation stagnates under the weight of state interference. Geopolitical instability would rise, with regional conflicts escalating as China flexes its muscles in the South China Sea and beyond.

The Gray Funeral Procession

The ultimate tragedy is that this erosion of freedom and prosperity won’t come with dramatic fanfare or a televised invasion, no “Red Dawn”. Instead it will creep in quietly, like the subtle manipulation of a For You Page. TikTok’s defenders will continue to mock concerns as paranoid delusions, influencers will churn out more lowbrow content for short-term gain, and Beijing will watch with a knowing smile.

If the United States stumbles, the gray funeral procession for human freedom won’t be led by tanks or troops. It will be choreographed, edited, and set to a catchy beat, live-streamed for billions to watch. And as the Clueless Apologists clap along, they’ll be too distracted to notice that the band isn’t just state-approved—it’s state-directed.

If this article resonated with you and you’re passionate about restoring conservatism as a movement grounded in principles and ideas, the time to act is now. Become a part of The Rational Purview community. For the cost of a cup of coffee, you can join as a paid subscriber—or sign up for free—and play a vital role in amplifying this mission.

But subscribing is just the beginning. Use your voice, your creativity, and your passion to drive change. Write. Share. Engage. Be the catalyst for the conservatism we desperately need—one of integrity, thoughtfulness, and vision.

Together, we can reclaim conservatism’s soul and shape its future. Join us today