The 14th Amendment Debate: Jurisdiction Misinterpreted

How modern misreadings distort original intent and undermine sovereignty.

Jan 22, 2025

∙ Paid

A small, cute, anthropomorphic gator named Croaky depicted as a historical figure at the debates for the 14th Amendment in the 1860s. Croaky has a Pixar-Disney style animation look, featuring his characteristic small size, gentle yet determined expression, and charming appearance. He is wearing 19th-century formal attire, including a waistcoat and cravat, standing confidently at a wooden podium. Behind him on a large, prominent scroll is the text '14th Amendment: Subject to the Jurisdiction Thereof,' written in bold, elegant calligraphy. He is surrounded by serious-looking, historically accurate congressmen engaged in a heated debate, with parchment documents and quill pens scattered on the desks. The scene is illuminated by warm, natural light streaming through large windows of a grand, ornate congressional chamber. The overall style is detailed and cinematic, capturing the weight and historical significance of the moment.

Since Trump’s inauguration I’ve been juggling several articles simultaneously, dissecting the intricacies of Trump’s executive orders like my youngest dog batting around a collection of his particularly infuriating toys. Given how many he’s been issuing good, bad and the ugly, I’ve got so much written I have to cut it down and find a better way that’s a…

The 14th Amendment Debate: Jurisdiction Misinterpreted

How modern misreadings distort original intent and undermine sovereignty.

This post is for paid subscribers